Taylor Swift op-ed writer is SLAMMED after claiming the popstar is 'not a good role model' because she is '34, unmarried and childless'

Trending 2 days ago
  • Conservative writer John Mac Ghlionn wrote nan op-ed for Newsweek past week
  • He's been bullied online for this misogynistic views
  • READ MORE: Taylor Swift fans convinced Travis Kelce amazed her connected Eras Tour

By Emily Lefroy For Dailymail.Com

Published: 15:48 EDT, 1 July 2024 | Updated: 15:55 EDT, 1 July 2024

Taylor Swift has plentifulness of songs astir feminism - and her 'f*** nan patriarchy' cognition appears to person struck a nervus pinch a blimpish journalist.

John Mac Ghlionn was slammed for his article accusing Swift - whose Eras Tour is nan highest-grossing performance circuit of each time - of being a bad power connected young girls.

In nan Newsweek portion titled Taylor Swift Is Not a Good Role Model, Ghilonn claimed nan songstress was mounting a mediocre illustration arsenic she's '34, unmarried and childless' - failing to telephone retired her boyfriend, Travis Kelce, for being nan same.

The op-ed writer penned nan portion past week to 'offer immoderate pushback' connected nan Taylor-mania that has swept nan globe - and has been swiftly bullied for his '1950s misogynistic' views.

In his piece, he claimed contempt nan popstar's 'talent for sparking conversations, driving engagement, and raking successful profits is commendable,' she is not a bully domiciled exemplary for young girls.

John Mac Ghlionn was slammed for his article accusing Taylor Swift - whose Eras circuit is nan highest-grossing performance circuit of each clip - of being a bad power connected young girls 

Commenting connected Swift's past relationships, Ghilonn suggested her martial position was important successful shaping her arsenic a domiciled model, citing her not being wed arsenic almost a sole logic girls should look elsewhere for a fig to emulate.

Although he acknowledged her 'musical talent and business acumen,' nan interrogator and essayist argued that 'instead of encouraging young girls to spot nan "Swift standard" arsenic nan norm,' they should beryllium encouraged to purpose for a romanticist manner that was a 'little more... wholesome.'

'Would immoderate loving genitor reference this want their girl to day 12 different men successful nan span of conscionable a fewer years?' he based on successful nan piece.

'This is not an onslaught connected Swift; it's a valid mobility that is worthy asking.'

Ghilionn did not remark connected nan truth that Swift's fellow Kelce is besides unmarried and 34 - which was instantly noticed by furious readers.

Branded an 'incel misogynist coward' by immoderate readers, irate users took to X, antecedently known arsenic Twitter, to stock their thoughts.

'What nan existent f*** is this misogynistic claptrap from @Newsweek?! Taylor Swift isn't a domiciled exemplary because she's "unmarried and childless", what nan hell? Written by a man, of course, but you should beryllium ashamed to person published this vacuous nonsense,' 1 personification wrote.

'No man has ever been chastised successful nan media for being a "bad domiciled exemplary for boys" because he was "34, unmarried and childless,"' different commented.

Someone other wrote: 'Young girls do not request to aspire to matrimony and children. I personally person nary liking successful Taylor Swift but location are worse domiciled models than personification who evidently useful difficult and is financially independent and besides made immense donations towards nutrient banks.'

John Mac Ghlionn (pictured) was slammed for his article accusing Taylor Swift - who's Eras circuit is nan highest-grossing performance circuit of each clip - of being a bad domiciled exemplary to young girls

Ghilionn did not remark connected nan truth Swift's boyfriend, Travis Kelce, is besides unmarried and 34 - which was instantly noticed by furious readers

Taylor Swift's Eras circuit is nan presently nan highest-grossing performance circuit of each time

Branded an 'incel misogynist coward' by immoderate readers, irate users took to X, antecedently known arsenic Twitter, to stock their thoughts - while immoderate agreed

A 4th chimed in: 'This man intelligibly doesn't understand patriarchy. Man mansplaining feminism, patriarchy and who is and is not a female domiciled model.'

Despite dense backlash, immoderate users praised Ghlionn for sharing his brash views.

'It is simply a constituent of view. Everyone is allowed to person one. I wouldn't want a girl seeking retired hollow fame personally. Money and adoration of nan masses thin to beryllium acold comfortableness successful later life,' 1 personification wrote.

'Personally, I perfectly emotion really triggered each nan woke feminazis are by this,' different snarked. 

'If there's thing incorrect pinch being unmarried and childless, what are you each truthful angry about?'

Ghlionn has since deleted his X account.

DailyMail.com has contacted Newsweek and Ghlionn for comment. 


Copyright © PAPAREAD.COM 2024

TV & SHOWBIZ